Tuesday, February 21, 2012

A fish called 'Haver'



OK
plenty of problems to deal with
today,
sounding with O
and starting with
K:

my friend,
Kevin Haverty is sixty
today;
we knew him a
half-decade less—
he’s

here, in
this poem, he’s been on my mind. His
woe-be-
gone fish has died
on my my time
and

I don’t
really know how to put that to rhyme:
he asked
on our last day
of work, “won’t you
please

take this
negligent burden from me?
Every
fish else I’ve man-
aged to dump. Just
this

lonely
last sucker and
I can
go free. It’s faith-
fully cleaned this
tank

and will
yours.”  I told him a lie—that I’d toss
the blame
fish out my car
window on my
drive

home. “Me
too—so you see where we stand. I got
luggage
to pack and much
on my mind.
Please.”

So I
did. I bagged the poor catfish and
hurried
on home. I rolled
down the window
and

hurled out
a prayer. King Lear came to mind: “Poor
naked
wretches, wheresoe’er
you are. I have
ta’en

too little
care of this.” Then “this set down this
set down
this” jettisoned
in—a blurring
of

Magi
in Eliot’s play. I took the
doomed fish
and stared at its
frown. ‘This set down
this set

down this.’…
The drive ended home, I dumped the
black load
in the depth of
my tank, too much
ta’en

with poor
fishes like it, I let him swim
free, and
he did. He lived
full in his fate
and

he died
yesterday. The other fish pecked
at his
body at rest.
I didn’t know then
that

he was
n’t with us. Divining his source,
his chaver,
he was—for here’s
where other pro-
blems

begin.
His name (if I gave it) was ‘Haver’
for ‘friend’.
In Gaelic it’s
Nonsense—a bab-
bling

end. But
Haver is how I referred to
the fish:
“How goes, little
chaver, and how
are

you out-
swimming Kevin, who died yester-
year? Your
cancer was cured
—his not—hard to
take

cheer…” but
I’ll never presume. Here’s food for
your day.
You died when I
wanted your world
yet

to stay.
You faithfully hoovered the brack
of my
tank. You friended
poor wretches, the
least

of these
fishes, and how now we honor
your life
and your trade? How
silly it seems,
how

terri-
bly vain. From one dying hand to
kindred
shell game, never
to gamble a-
gain.

Now hush,
little chaver (your semblance to Bach),
take cheer
and no nonsense
and ultimate
calm

that this
set down this is what everyone
gains in
forgettable flits
and cleansing re-
mains

You did
what you needed, for us and for
you. You
lived and then died,
for us to cons-
true...

or not—
to fathom, I'm over my head:
a man-be-
gone fish is (shall
we say?) god-damned
dead.

Not here
to flaunt what we know is the law—my
father
‘God damned’ only
once in recall
and

surely
not over a scarpering fish, nor
a screed
about someone
who crossed a mere
line.

It was,
rather, an inchoate jab at
dispa-
rate deeds. We suck
what we want, we
sieve

what we
need and we live or we die on that
fragile
thneed. Bemoan the
poor precedent
that

buries
this plea: we’re poor naked wretches
who pine
less to be free
and more to be
known

as hav-
er, as friend, as nonsense  can be.
as fish
or foul, as man
(rest in grace) as
me.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Baptism of Joshua Paul

(Sermon by Joseph Vold, October 12, 1969)

TEXT: John 9: 24-41

If we had a person here in our midst who had been blind from the day he was born, and now on this day, he hears the word of a physician —and follows it and of a sudden —he is no longer blind but can see —SAY WE WITNESSED THIS we would be overwhelmed by the event.  He was blind, but now he can see —oh,! we would be amazed by the fact!  We would be mightily impressed, and would never forget it.

BUT THAT HAPPENED HERE TODAY IN OUR VERY MIDST.  Through baptism.  It has happened to this child, Joshua Paul.

In the catacombs of Rome where early Christians gathered to hide from hostile authorities to keep from being killed and to live and to worship, they left on the walls frescoes, pictures of what they treasured.  The story of the man born blind appears seven times in catacomb art, most frequently as an illustration of Christian baptism.  This story was taken by the early church as an interpretation of what happens in baptism.

When the early Christians were about to baptize a person who had been prepared and was brought forward to be a member of the Body of Christ, i.e. the church, they read Chapter 9 of John —the story of the man born blind and healed through washing —they read this chapter together.

The early Church Fathers referred to baptism as the washing away of blindness.  Tertullian opened his book (or tract) on baptism with the words ‘Happy is the sacrament of our water, in that, by washing away the sins of our early blindness, we are set free unto eternal life.’

Augustine comments on our text:  “This blindman stands for the human race ....if the blindness is lack of faith, then the seeing (illumination) is faith ....  He washes his eyes in that pool which is
interpreted ‘one who has been sent’; he was baptized in Christ.”

I would like to draw from the entire ninth chapter of John for our sermon today to show what God does in baptism.

FOR THE MAN BORN BLIND WHO IS MET BY CHRIST AND HIS LOVING ACTION: Instead of darkness or blindness, there is light and ability to see.  There is much stress on the fact that the man in our text was born blind.  It is mentioned —this fact of being blind at birth —no less than seven times.

Now when we consider a little child —that cuddly little bundle who is so winning —mostly because he is so small and helpless and dependent —we overlook this fact of his being blind.   Unless he is enlightened, unless he receives the vision of God he will remain in darkness —He will not know who he is and what he came into the world for.  But Christ comes and brings enlightenment starting with the washing of baptism.  The one who has the Christ and his light through faith has the vision of God.

But how can such a little child be enlightened?  He does not know, surely he does not know what is going on.  He cannot have faith or comprehension.  So some will argue.

The only way this little one is going to know of Christ (have the vision of God) is if the church loves him —and, loving him, teach him of the good news we have.  The first and second —and third lesson —and all the way through the last lesson we teach should be this: God loves you so much that he has adopted you to be his own, and we, the church, love and care for you as a brother.  You start teaching that lesson from the very first day.  We know that an infant child may not understand much but he surely feeds on love —and he is nourished by the love that people can give to him.  The parents can love him just because Christ has loved us and gave His life for us.  The parents can be patient and forgive because Christ forgives us and is patient with us and keeps bringing us back.

The child is going to know of Christ as the church shows care for him.  The child will know of Christ as people in the church live the life of Christ, live the way of the cross in the community.  He will not know the fullness of the faith as a baby or as a little boy —or as a young man.  BUT LOVE CANNOT FAIL.  He will know someday.  He will know the greatness of what has happened to him in the claim of God in baptism —the miracle of new life —someday I believe that.  I am filled with high hope for him because of the Word of God.

Now in the ninth chapter of John we see a gradual dawning —an increase in knowledge for this man who received his sight from Jesus.

The Jews —it is the way of the world with, or against, the baptized —would not accept that Jesus had accomplished the restoring of sight to this blind man.  They hounded the man who had been born blind.  “How were your eyes opened?”  The man Jesus did it.  “Where is he?”  I don’t know.

Later on they wanted to press him further on this matter so they asked, “What do you say about Jesus?”  The former blind man said:  He is a prophet.

Now in the part of the chapter that is the text for today the Pharisees (or Jews) are pressing him again and are trying to teach that Christ is not good or able to heal blindness.  The man says plainly to them: I don’t know whether Jesus is a sinner or not, but once I was blind, now I can see.  The man has great power.

Growing recognition of the fact and the power of Jesus as the one who gives light and goodness in life —This is the thing that happens to the child who is brought up in the baptismal covenant.  He doesn’t know all the answers about Jesus, but he learns of his life and his power —because of what Christ —and the Body of Christ —can do and has done for him.

When the man who had been born blind answers the Pharisees that someone who does such great things —so good —has got to be from God —he gets clobbered by the Jews.  The baptized, who live by their baptism, may share the same reaction from the world —but they hold fast to Christ who gives light and life.

Finally this man is confronted again by the Christ who tells him who he is and asks, “Do you believe?”  He said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him.

The child who is baptized may not know the fullness of the truth of Christ, but as he experiences the power of God through the Church —through loving people as well as the Word and Sacraments —he will one day also fall down and worship Jesus as the Lord.

He will someday know how much he needed this act of baptism, this washing away of blindness of the natural man.  He will someday know how necessary it was for God to come to him and to give forgiveness and light.  He will know that he passed from blindness to the vision of God through Christ (Once I was blind —now I can see).  He will know it because of the church, the caring, faithful, loving, teaching, acting church.  And he will be glad for the judgment of God.  The judgment of God upon this little one baptized here today is YES, you are my child.

That’s what I want to teach him to know the rest of the years I have to be his earthly father and his brother in the church.  Will you help me to teach him that?

AMEN: YES, YES and it shall be so.

I want to teach my children...


Dan, you can deal me in - but only if we can get more than two people at the table!  Meanwhile, here is my offering for February.

A month ago Josh brought over a few boxes of Joe Vold’s school notebooks and sermons.  At first glance, Dad’s sermons were not well organized, maybe partly from being moved from parish to parish and from file cabinets to boxes, but probably this was more a reflection of the Joe Vold way of life.  He always liked Abe Lincoln, who was said to have written the Gettysburg address on the back of an envelope, and throughout the Concordia years Dad seems to have taken this to heart.  Everything is written on 5.5 x 8.5 half sheets, usually recycling the backs of bulletins, always handwritten in a single draft.  Sometimes the 5-6 page sermons were stapled, but when they were loose they did not always stay together in the box.

I did not set out to dive into these sermons, but on first browse I was immediately intrigued.  For all that went on in the late sixties, Dad did not go off the message of salvation too much, which was intriguing enough, but then there was also a sermon just after the Apollo 11 moon landing, and references to flower children, Mai Lai and Vietnam War, tensions in the middle east, race relations at home, a political convention in Chicago.  And then, within only minutes of opening the second box, I came across the sermon that I am sharing with you all today, the message Dad delivered on the day of Joshua’s baptism.  I’ve already given Josh a copy of this, and it is at Mom’s suggestion that I am posting this to the Symposia.  So here you are, a Joe Vold sermon fully transcribed.

I have since spent a few weeks of evening hours doing my best to put the Concordia Scandia years in order.  The sermons were sometimes dated but more often they had only cryptic clues of their season.  I now know, for instance, that Oculi Sunday occurs before Exaudi Sunday.  Yes, there was also a three year lectionary cycle of scriptural texts, except that Dad would not regularly write down the specific text reference. When one is not writing to the future and is speaking to people who have bulletin references in front of them, not much more needs to be said on the sermon page than a self-direction to “Read the Text.”

So, thanks to the lectionary calendars that were also in the boxes, I did.  And thanks to all the stray pages, when paper styles and ink colors weren’t enough to reorder things, I read more of the sermons than I had first expected to.

After Concordia, Dad seems to have started dispensing of formalities, perhaps not needing to write out the sermons as much, or being less inclined to preserve the paperwork.  There are still quite a few loose pages with Bejou references, though, and I look forward to getting to these.  But so far, I am just through the end of 1969.

I will post the baptism sermon separately, but here are a couple of notes and quotes from various other sermons that jumped out at me.

At least twice, Dad brought up the hymn Joy to the World out of season, in October and February.  “Isaac Watts was a forgiven man --a free man --a man who couldn't contain himself.”

Written six months before Josh was born: “I want to teach my children that they have a name and a goal.  They have names, Jonathan and Daniel, but they have another name, and it is Christian. ...Christian, do you know your name?”

In a sermon on how all “ask-seek-knock” prayers are answered:  “What is it to pray if it is not to pray in the Spirit, with the Spirit, for the Spirit?  ...For when a man asks and seeks and knocks for this, he asks for everything there is.”

In a sermon titled “Your Life Is In God’s Hands”: “There will be a triumphant end ---a harvest that is abundant.  I am thinking of my brother, Paul, who has been in surgery this week. ....The insignificance of the beginning and the triumph of the end!”

After Apollo 11: “To have the power to live in love for and in peace with those around you --with your neighbor --that is greater than walking on the moon.”

On a Sunday before Thanksgiving: “People don't give thanks because they have plenty... They give thanks when they clearly recognize that what they have is a gift.”

On “Refreshment Sunday”: “My father was a simple man.  He loved the Gospel of John and he taught me to love it too.”

“When you hear the words, This is my body given for you, and you believe that God loves you so much he died for you, you will know what it was like for the poor man who found a treasure in his field....”

Lastly, I can still hear Dad speaking often of the “little ones” who are, as we all are, children of God.  How neat is it to see that phrase first appear prominently in a sermon for Joshua’s first sign of the cross!

Saturday, February 11, 2012

A Queen of Spades


The following poem is based on an exercise I like to do with my creative writing elective, the newest installment unfolding as we speak. Deal out cards to see what you/your fellow players get. Enforce that three random pieces from those cards enter into your poem. In my case, I was dealt the Queen of Spaces (easy!), the Jack of Hearts and the 9 of diamonds, plus two other cards that I can, by rules of this game, discard. My deck of cards had an extra feature of Russian churches pictured within--they, too, could factor in the process of writing freely with random factors playing foil. This poem began as my students began, about 15 minutes after our hand was dealt. Admittedly, I've put some extra time in its present draft:

A queen of spades
            doesn’t need a knight—she
                        operates by day looking all alone
                                    for creatures in their ninth and kills them
                                                royally, without a warning call.

You’d say that ninth
            is past due anyway:
                        why should felines get
                                    what striving, writhing blastulas
                                                remotely cannot hope?                    

Why weep for
            fortunes—kings and queens—
                        if, like Macbeths, they only dwell on
                                    only death, such heavens and such hell?
                                                Why play our hand in cat-

scratch all-indulgent
            lands, and all the while
                        the Queen of Spades sits patiently,
                                    seizing nothing not her own. She isn’t
                                                Jezebel or any of her clones.
                         
We go to churches,
            temples, mosques to
                        stand against this queen. We do
                                    not win, we rather sing the futility
                                                of her cause and thus
                       
We take her in.
            She’s lonely, after all,
                        and probably she kills to have
                                    some friends. An educated guess, of course,
                                                and one we’ll have to fill.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Poetry Spinning


Thanks Dan - I don’t know if you all heard the understory to that poem, and Dan I hope you don’t mind me sharing what is after all a good story.  There are annual parties in Prague, and probably worldwide, to honor Bobby Burns, and at these parties the guests are asked to bring a poem to recite.  I suppose that most will simply offer (or not so simply, having to memorize with all th’inflections) one of Burns’s own, but Dan wanted to be different and write his own poem, not to a louse or a mouse but to a grouse.  He asked for my feedback, and I suggested, way too sheepishly and before seeing the final product, that he could still take the easy route and sing his version of Danny Boy, hoping no one would complain that it was an Irish song.  Anyway, Good for ye, brother, for bein’ bold!

I am taking Dan’s encouragement to submit at least one monthly entry to the Symposia.  I don’t have a poem this time around (and remember, fellow bloggers, poems are not the prerequisite anyway), but I do want to share how I have been influenced by poetry on several levels lately.  First, I have to tell you all about a new phone/ipad app that the Poetry Foundation has put out.  I can’t even begin to describe it, but it uses a “spin” button to put random poetry in front of you like nothing I’d ever imagined.  Check it out at  http://www.poetryfoundation.org/mobile/, and don’t be intimidated by the 35Mb download.  It takes a little time and available memory, but it’s worth it.  I might even actually finally subscribe to Poetry Magazine because of this.

Second, I am inspired by Kirsten, who was recently frustrated by her LA teacher’s admonition not to beat poems to death in trying to interpret them.  I sympathized but ultimately took her teacher’s side, partly because I had just been reading and trying to memorize Mary Olver’s Hawk, a poem that, as it turns out, is specifically about that.  I won’t repeat the poem here, being recently aware of potential SOPA violations, but the poet sees a hawk and starts to romanticize, then has to remind herself that this is “heaven’s fistful of death and destruction.”  But the hawk looks so remarkable perched on a dead tree that she starts to think of “the tree, the cave, the white lily of the resurrection.” And that’s when the hawk proceeds to do what hawks do.  But this, too, is not what Oliver wrote.  You have to read the poem yourself and appreciate her struggles and reminders and disappointments, all of which are part of the poem.  As Frost said, “Poetry is what gets lost in translation.”

Nonetheless, Kirsten’s teacher inspired me to try to interpret, yet not beat to death, one of Frost‘s own poems.  I picked “Never Again Would Birds’ Song Be The Same,” whose full meaning had erstwhile escaped me.  I think I have a grasp of it now, but only after looking at the particular meaning of each word —and yet the poem is still alive!  Try just the first five lines (SOPA will not reach fair use) for yourselves, and ask yourselves, who is “he”?  Where is “there”?  How many voices?  What is an “oversound”?  And how much is considered before the poet even gets to Eve?

He would declare and could himself believe
That the birds there in all the garden round
From having heard the daylong voice of Eve
Had added to their own an oversound,
Her tone of meaning but without the words.

Third influence comes from Andrew, who has memorized a four line poem, which came to him while using Bartlett’s to compose an American Revolution essay.  The teacher made him pick a different quote, as he was supposed to be taking the Tory’s side, but this time I think the teacher is full of beans.  SOPA will not reach noncopyrighted poems (generally those before about 1923), so here it is, W.B. Yeats’s The Great Day:

Hurrah for revolution and cannon-shot!
A beggar upon horseback lashes a beggar on foot.
Hurrah for revolution and cannon come again!
The beggars have changed places but the lash goes on.

Well, that’s my spin for January.  Here’s to hearing more!

Saturday, January 28, 2012

To a Grouse


On finding m’self i’ need of vice
presidential—providential?—advice


I learnt from thee, ye blastit louse
to see oursels as ithers see us;
an’ best-laid schemes gang aft agley—
You, tim’rous mousie, taught this much to me.

So turn our sights now to a grouse—
that quailin’ quib tha’ makes a house
i’ fieldside shrub an’ suffers fate;
Dick Cheney, meanwhile, shoots his mate

an’ spares our ruffled galliform.
Their faces red, a gath’ring storm
befalls the arrant knaves. “You louse!” says one,
“Keep mum,” th’ ither, “—they’ll take me for a souse!

“I had a nip o’ whiskey, see—
the aimin’ sure was not from me:
forsooth the Red Red Grouse—he lets
my vice become a virtue, an’ roundly gets

my versus, too. He keeps me sane
an’ questions not, nor gi’es away our game.
We’re hunting, after all, oursels.”
So endeth Dick.  Th’ ither never tells.

Then waddlin’ and warblin’, our
hero lives at least anither hour.
Ye might debate th’ just deserts
of birdshot i’ th’ face, which hurts

—yet doesn’t do th’ critter in.
He an’ ye must live to hunt agin.
O, grouse until yer wounds have healed,
O, leave all lessons i’ th’ field!

I’ll take sich notes fer Robbie Burns
An’ clink a glass each year he turns.
Imbibe that bird from Scotland, sir:
fer aimin’ luck and logic sure.


Happy 253rd, Robert Burns!

Saturday, December 31, 2011

The Blue Swallows, by Howard Nemerov

Across the millstream below the bridge
Seven blue swallows divide the air
In shapes invisible and evanescent,
Kaleidoscopic beyond the mind’s
Or memory’s power to keep them there.

“History is where tensions were,”
“Form is the diagram of forces.”
Thus, helplessly, there on the bridge,
While gazing down upon those birds—
How strange, to be above the birds!—
Thus helplessly the mind in its brain
Weaves up relation’s spindrift web
Seeing the swallows’ tails as nibs
Dipped in invisible ink, writing . . .

Poor mind, what would you have them write?
Some cabalistic history
Whose authorship you might ascribe
To God? to Nature? Ah, poor ghost,
You’ve capitalized your Self enough.
That villainous William of Occam
Cut out the feet from under that dream
Some seven centuries ago.
It’s taken that long for the mind
To waken, yawn and stretch, to see
With opened eyes emptied of speech
The real world where the spelling mind
Imposes with its grammar book
Unreal relations on the blue 
Swallows. Perhaps when you will have

Fully awakened, I shall show you
A new thing: even the water
Flowing away beneath those birds
Will fail to reflect their flying forms,
And the eyes that see become as stones
Whence never tears shall fall gain.

O swallows, swallows, poems are not
The point. Finding again the world,
That is the point, where loveliness
Adorns intelligible things
Because the mind’s eye lit the sun.

What would you write?

Dear Symposians,

I have another poem to share, and this time with some spindrift analysis.  The poem is another one by someone else: The Blue Swallows, by Howard Nemerov. The analysis is a parsing of the poem’s abundant allegories.

I first planned on sending this just to Dan, as I thought he might be more receptive to my urge to deconstruct, but then I remembered that I had once shared a few lines of this with you, Anne, and then I discovered some Stillwater symbolism in the poem, and then I realized how much this poem reminds me of the birds of Windmill Creaks (the swallows at the millstream, and a midstream tie to of one of my most Windmill Creakish poems (“What would you write, Ruben...”).   With all of that, I knew I had to post this on the Water-blog.

For those interested in the allegories, my fascination was how this poem brought together so many subjects of which I know next to nothing (D’Arcy Thompson’s force diagrams, Jung’s archetypal Self, Occam’s Razor, the Kaballah, the Vedas, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, Plotinus’s Enneads, even a Hamlet allegory), and how ironic it was that the poem would pique my interests in these subjects before ultimately directing me to find the world again and see things without the “spelling mind.”

I purposefully found the allegories on my own, with the help of Google and Wikipedia but without reading anyone else’s analysis of the poem.  Occam’s razor was easy enough, because I had actually heard of that before, and the author of the second quoted passage was quickly revealed (Thompson), but it took me a while to learn that the first quote is a less common translation from Marx’s manifesto.  I wasn’t keen on embarking further into communism, let alone delving into an introduction to cabalistic history or Jung’s capitalized Self. But the kaleidoscope of allegories kept appearing.  From Hamlet, “ Alas, poor ghost.” From the Vedas, Brhadaranyaka Upanishad (I.3.28): “From the unreal lead me to the Real.”  From Plotinus: “Never did eye see the sun unless it had first become sun-like.”  Or more expositively, from Plato’s Republic: “Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eyes are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.”

What led to all of this?  Wanting to pick a poem, other than one of my own, to memorize. I’ve always liked this poem but never fully understood it, and I thought a quick study would help me commit it to memory.  And it has.  I’ve done it! Memorized it, I mean; I think I’m only about halfway to understanding it.

And why, again, this interest in memory work?  In getting back to those walking hours in the mornings and afternoons (birding interests having been set aside by full time parenting duties, then being more directly replaced by having a dog to pull me along), I have found it invigorating to exercise more than the legs.

But why do I bring this to the Stillwater Symposia?  I suppose Nemerov would say that I am missing the point with this poem, and yet in our own way, with this blog, we are finding the world again.   But there’s more.  I’ve got a paraphrase, just for you symposians.  And in my efforts to understand this poem, I don’t think the poet would mind if I brought God back into it (as long as he was not too Selfish, or political, or scientific, or cabalistic, or presupposed).

O sister, brothers, water is not
The point.  Watching it flow, that
Is the point, and celebrating
Truth at every shore, because
Our faith has set us free.

Monday, December 26, 2011

Boxing Day

As mentioned yesterday, I’ve added an extra verse to my Christmas eve poem. I was happy to hear all your positive feedback on this one, thank you, but with verses for Mary and Joseph and the shepherds, I knew I still needed this one more. The blog system doesn’t automatically tell you about edits, a good thing sometimes, but please take a look.

The system also doesn’t alert everyone to particular comments, but Dan has had a few insightful ones to me lately, and I actually explained a little about this poem in a comment I made to Dan. I was inspired in part by a Good Friday sermon by S.M. Lockridge that had a certain cadence to it. The parenthetical sometimeses are meant to help set this cadence, and I’ve found that this poem reads just as well, maybe better, if you skip some of the sometimes (excepting the nonparenthetical one) and just give that much of a pause to those parts of the poem.

One more time, Merry Christmas! It was good to see you all yesterday, Dan’s family included! One of these days, I’ll figure out Skype too.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Christmas Eve 2011

It’s cold outside (sometimes)
and it might snow (sometimes)
I feel the wind (sometimes)
but Sunday’s coming.

As we grow old (sometimes)
we drift apart (sometimes)
a thousand miles (sometimes),
but Sunday’s coming.

Memories stir. I hear a song
that makes me smile, and I start singing.

I don’t know where these winds will blow
but I believe that Sunday’s coming.



They count on us (sometimes)
though we are strangers (sometimes)
far from home (sometimes)
but Sunday’s coming.

And travel’s tough (sometimes)
and there’s no room (sometimes),
we’re all alone (sometimes)
but Sunday’s coming.

And we take comfort where we can,
and when it comes it ends up being

all we need. Sometimes a few warm words
are all it takes. Sunday’s coming.



Lately I feel (sometimes)
I've worked so hard (sometimes)
the whole night through (sometimes),
but Sunday’s coming,

Out in the fields (sometimes),
out in the dirt (sometimes),
out with the beasts (sometimes),
but Sunday’s coming.

I want to hear what shepherds hear,
and see the things that they’ve been seeing.

I want to stand next to the choir
and hear the song of Sunday's coming.




We've come this far (sometimes)
from distant lands (sometimes)
to see a child's eyes.
Sunday's coming.

And we've brought gifts (sometimes)
fit for a king (sometimes)
into this country barn.
Sunday's coming.

I want to see what wise men see.
I want to go where they are going.

I want to know the light that leads
to Christmas time and Sundays coming.

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Cesky Lev (Czech Lion)

An old man, Shklovsky, in 'eighty-one, argued
that poets rarely last into their old age.
And if they do, they become ministers of small
republics. One hopes that Havel has a more
lasting legacy than proving Shklovsky right.

He was the sole cesky lev left in the land.
For all the mythos of the two-tailed Aslan
that feigns a ferocious rule fair and wide—a
Charles the Fourth, a Good King Wenceslas (looked out),
a Masaryk that never needed roar—but

ever staked a human-ness between the dread
regimes: Hapsburgs in their catholic birthright,
the Nazis in their nihil schtadt, the Marxists…
God, the Marxists, who bade the bloody day to
Brezhnev, who flushed it all away.  So Vaclav

rallied what he could—an isle of misfit toys—
to sign the future of their fate. No Dubcek
now to abdicate, nor suicidal flames;
on paper thin as samizdat he got the
names of levs like him and gently gave them in.

You’d think it wouldn’t make a dent—Helsinki
human rights accords are nothing if not weak.
Then tender all the mice to squeak and maybe
(as with Gandhi) the march is more than making
salt. Truth and love over lies and hate. Amen.

He wanted to say so in his plays. Alas,
they simpered into hidden deeps—along with
Hrabel’s bar-room breath, they reeled about in jest.
Theatre of the true absurd, here Havel
didn’t object. Truth and love over lies and…

Now we're suddenly without him. Lions in
this world are slim.  I guess the two tails are to
tell which way we’ve come from, or to sway us not
toward one side or the other. We’ve seen extremes
and know they’re not to die for. Live long, dear Lev.

Friday, December 23, 2011

Merry Christmas, all!

This morning’s email didn’t say who had actually posted Journey of the Magi, and I was intrigued.  Was this Mom? Anne?  The blogsite told me it was Dan of course, but the temporary mystery was compelling, and seeing it there on the blog I was inspired to read the poem again, this time out loud.   I have put my kids through this kind of thing more than they care for, but this morning, maybe in the spirit of Christmas, they resisted groaning and even seemed to listen and appreciate the recital.  When I was done I asked, “What do you think? Publishable?”  After an earnest pause, Kirsten said, “Yes.”  I suspect Mr. Eliot would be grateful.

Poetry works best when spoken aloud.   I went on to read your earlier blog, Dan, the email of which for some reason I had not seen, and I was immediately reminded of another, less famous person who had died last week: Christopher Hitchens.   He was a journalist who I do not remember ever reading, but apparently he wrote boldly and he had a lot of respect among his peers, several of whom devoted column-length eulogies in the Tribune.   From Clarence Page: 


“It seemed at first that he had refused or forgotten the host's request to bring, instead of gifts, a poem to read at the party. But when his turn came, he smoothly recited a touchingly appropriate work by William Butler Yeats without hesitation or a hint of uncertainty. This brought applause and a request for an encore, which he granted without the blink of an eye. He seemed to have a library of literature in his head.”

I do not have such a library, but I am appreciating lately, by memorizing a few of my own poems or helping Andrew with Confirmation bible verses, but just as much by reading good things put in front of me, how rich it can be to recite or read something aloud.   A few weeks ago Kirsten’s homework inspired me to read Huck Finn Chapter 31 aloud (“You can’t pray a lie”).  A few Sundays ago I felt privileged to be a lector in church, reading the beginnings of Luke’s Christmas story (“Nothing is impossible with God”).

A year-end thanks, to Dan for inspiring and advancing this Symposia idea and to everyone for keeping it going.  And do not feel that you need something original to post here.   It’s all good!

Journey of the Magi

'A cold coming we had of it,
Just the worst time of year
For a journey, and such a long journey:
The ways deep and the weather sharp,
The very dead of winter.'
And the camels galled, sore-footed, refractory,
Lying down in the melting snow.
There were times we regretted
The summer palaces on slopes, the terraces,
And the silken girls bringing sherbet.
Then the camel men cursing and grumbling
And running away, and wanting their liquor and women,
And the night-fires going out, and the lack of shelters,
And the cities hostile and the towns unfriendly
And the vilages dirty and charging high prices:
A hard time we had of it.
At the end we preferred to travel all night,
Sleeping in snatches,
With the voices singing in our ears, saying
That this was all folly.

   Then at dawn we came down to a temperate valley,
Wet, below the snow line, smelling of vegetation;
With a running stream and a water-mill beating the darkness,
And three trees on the low sky,
And an old white horse galloped away in the meadow.
Then we came to a tavern with vine-leaves over the lintel,
Six hands at an open door dicing for pieces of silver,
And feet kicking the empty wine-skins.
But there was no information, and so we continued
And arrived at evening, not a moment too soon
Finding the place; it was (you may say) satisfactory.

   All this was a long time ago, I remember,
And I would do it again, but set down
This set down
This: were we led all that way for
Birth or Death? There was a Birth, certainly,
We had evidence and no doubt. I had seen birth and death,
But had thought they were different; this Birth was
Hard and bitter agony for us, like Death, our death.
We returned to our places, these Kingdoms,
But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation,
With an alien people clutching their gods.
I should be glad of another death.

T.S. Eliot, "Journey of the Magi" (1930)

Sunday, December 18, 2011

in memorium: Vaclav Havel (1936-2011)

The news today strikes me viscerally. Some of our 11th graders are studying Havel's plays, and beyond them, the power of graceful dissidence. From his Letters to Olga, 1980:

"It's strange, and at this moment almost incomprehensible, that a few hours ago we saw each other and were talking as though nothing had happened. Was it true? I suppose so. One never ceases to be amazed."

Also, his general philosophical footprint: "Truth and love must prevail over lies and hatred."

indeed. Sbohem, Vaclave.

Monday, December 12, 2011

Tony's Legacy (or Dadly Advice)


Proud March, ninety-nine
     in a place where Hrabel soared away
Dad died before his time
     set it down—the Word is bound to stay

And I’ll try, odds defy
                 please to get him through this life

Come sing, key of D
     so said Tony — coo as babies do
Daisies? Nevadi
     there’s a world of tunes that you can choose

Start with Bach, lest you talk
                 too much through the key of D

Then you might turn to flight
                 and sing Mother Nature’s Son

Joe grew — babies will
     six-years old he gets his first guitar
Czech flag, fits the bill —
     bridge your fingers, touch the deep blue star

And I’ll try, odds defy
                 please to get him through this life

Sad June, twenty twelve
     saw my mentor wave his work away
Not so — truth to tell
     all resounds, and hear his song today

Key of D, come and sing
     what you never sang before

Nothing’s done—babies run
                 with the things we sing today



Sunday, December 11, 2011

Update

The two link errors in my last posting are now fixed.

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Mathematics

1

Once one is one and only one:
the perfect unity;
one less than this is emptiness.

One finds one cannot be
without the other; none’s the lover
who can love alone,
  

but when two lovers come together
and become their own
identity they start to see

the journey they’ve begun,
their heart and mind as one combined:
once one is one is one.


2

One unexpressed, no more, no less
than one, will always be
itself, the integer of

individuality
existing to exist. One who
insists without a sound

on keeping his position is
a shadow on the ground,
no more, no less than emptiness,

a countenance unknown,
a spirit unsuspected:
one unmoving, one alone.


3

One added to one more is two,
a plain duality
and nothing less than two, unless
each looks for unity

receptively. Two cannot see
as one as long as one

turns from the other; none’s the lover
who can love alone,

and lonely thus, there is no us
to see for “me” and “you”;

But if there’s “us,” there’s one. We must
adjust our point of view

Or be as lonely marchers, one
plus one forever two....

   
4

One from itself
is none, the self
defying gravity

to find the place
that has no place,
a new reality

of nothingness.
It comes to this:
leave everything behind,

the ground you stand,
the world you wander,
every gravity

that spins you ‘round
and weighs you down;
believe that there can be

somewhere a place
that has no place,
a love that will allow

one to be none,
two to be one:
the self-effacing vow.

D, as in This is the Day

An entry a month is a good goal, Dan, and I like the suggestion. Looking back, I see that I have added nothing much since August, so I guess I should get busy.

It has been a different few months for me, though, even apart from the symposia, to which I have had no new poems at all to offer. I think this has been largely because of my build-up to the pinnacle event of this week, last Tuesday, my D Day. Dissolution. Default prove-up. Disavowed. Done. I briefly thought I ought to write a poem for the occasion, but nothing seemed to come of it. But thanks in part to you, Dan, I am now resolved: Your “Key of D” poem will have a much more positive resonance than anything I might write about divorce, and I will not dwell on trying to create something out of ashes.

Instead, I will offer something from the past. Lately, instead of writing something new, I have been more reflective on some poems already written, trying to work out bugs and, in the course of my daily dog walking, memorizing a few favorites. The memory work started with my Walking Song, which you will now find on these pages completely revised; that’s been followed with Melodia, and Starry Night, and Standing In An Open Field, and Burrowing Owl. Feel free to follow the links to these, but for today, and for this blog, I am offering what I’m working on memorizing next: Mathematics. Yes, there are a few ashes here in this two year old poem, but maybe even some embers to remember.

There are better things to memorize, of course. Andrew is beginning bible verse memory work in confirmation. On his own (inspired by the verse he found posted at the beginning of Ben Mikaelsen’s Petey), he first picked Isaiah 40: 31 (wings of eagles). Then, because he needed an easier one for his next effort, I offered him Psalm 118:24 (This is the day) with its memory-friendly song to go with it. Four more to go! We are told that Jesus wept, John 3:16 and the Lord’s prayer don’t count for this task. Suggestions, anyone?

Finally, I wanted to report that for the first time in three years, we have put up a Christmas tree, and it feels good to get past the hiatus. This too had been for a lot of D-minor reasons; Disc-slippage in 2009, Displaced home in 2010, and even this year I was on the verge of D-claring myself a D-termined iconoclast. Bah! I had even persuaded Kirsten to share my logic. This morning, as I floated the idea of going out to get one today, she told me “Don’t worry Dad, it’s not worth the trouble.” That settled it. An hour later, after quickly throwing up some lights on the front hedges, we were down the block with the dolly. We will decorate tonight. It’s nice to get back to D-major words.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Advent(ure)

Dad loved this cognate, that Advent resonates a sense of adventure (even the treasure island kind). I enjoyed writing 'Advent Emma's turning two' some 5+ years ago and hope to update that soon.

For now, two sketchy reasons for posting here today. Three if I include the perspicacious desire to have Stillwater postings every month (still 25 days left in December, btw):
  • Our beloved colleague Tony Ackerman, fellow erstwhile Bop (you've met him, Mom and Dick) and great guitarist, is retiring this year. By May I'll be involved in sundry tributes--I understand a pastiche of 'Fiddler on the Roof' is in the works highlighting the 'tradition' he represents at our school. Meanwhile, I want to work on a poem dedicated to him for a memory book we'll give him. Of all the fatherly advice I got in 1999, I remember his very clearly: play music to your infant Joey in the key of D. I did, and songs like "Go to Sleep You Weary Hobo" and "Dear Prudence" (Tony doesn't adhere much to rock n roll but would love to do a second doctoral thesis--a 'real one', he'd say--on the Beatles' White Album), "Goin' to California" and a few others have been mainstays in our milking-the-cows sessions. I cannot play Bach's aria to suite #3 in D major, but I'm on record for wanting that to feature at my funeral. Tony warms up every day to Bach. I don't know exactly how to craft this poem, and of course I could try to compose a song for him...but he has enjoyed when I've made poems for parting colleagues, and I don't know if I want to strain his ear with my hack musicianship.
  • My group of ten sophomores comprising an elective course of Journalism this semester (and Creative Writing next) have this as their newsblog so far: http://blogs.isp.cz/news/  Any feedback from y'all would be invaluable--feel free to comment on any story or feature you'd like. We are troubleshooting some interesting territory, like a student using his/her YouTube account to create something for the newsblog and then, unwittingly, availing whatever other videos YouTube deems worth our follow-up (the infamous 'if you like this, maybe you'd like this...').
So not much of an Advent reflection here--Josh, can you supply the theology we forever need?--but December is here, days are busy, you're all in mind and prayers.

And Advent Emma has turned seven. As Dad would say, "Ho!"

love,
Dan

Monday, October 17, 2011

Rain, Rain Go Away (Stara Evropa #8)

Sylvia had only one wart, but it grew hairs rapidly and sat on the side of her neck, where she felt men most liked to kiss. When she was nine she tried to cut it off with a scissors, and when the bleeding wouldn’t stop her mother called an ambulance which carried her from the northeast side of Szarvas to the centrum. Though she couldn’t see outside, Sylvia knew the road they were taking would require a ferry transit across a small width of river, and thus the extent of the emergency was gauged in her mind. The highway bridge some four kilometers south would not make for a faster trip, even as the ferry floated with its familiar languor.

The doctors stitched up the wound but didn’t (or couldn’t) remove the cause. The wart grew back with a vengeful lack of shape, bigger for its adjoining scar. The climate in southern Hungary didn’t compel scarves for more than a couple weeks of winter, and the adults in Sylvia’s life mostly discouraged any neck wrap indoors. Strangely, she thought, the best rival for this barnacle was the folding flesh that came with a fatty diet and the habit of shrugging her shoulders, or pulling her head into herself as a turtle would. She knew this was no fix and imagined there were less tangible reasons she’d want to shrink so, but at least she could feel herself smiling, and it was easier to interact with people.

Szarvas was an undeniably serene place to grow up, especially on the winding river that seemed a part of everyone’s backyard. The banks were flat and unweedy, as if the catfish scoured the sandy bed to match the neatly mown grass of most properties. Lazily, folks of all ages would walk into the olive water and give it some flow; they’d swim across in twelve strokes, or wade in the prevailing shallows, or sit as grizzlies, minus the bulk and hunger. Boats would putter by, unnecessarily but welcome at any rate. There was simultaneously plenty of movement and nothing really to do.

And so Sylvia did not suffocate there, and thought hard about her eventual migration to Debrecen, the largest city in the east and the chance to become a paramedic. Plan A would have been Szeged and something to do with its therapeutic waters; Plan B—Budapest for a broader university life; Debrecen wasn’t even a plan, and thus just happened upon Sylvia without much forethought. It was funny, she thought, that no one ever asked if she had been in an ambulance before, and as the training channeled her towards hands-on situations, she felt nimble—a fish in these waters. She hated the ‘hamburger movies’ of disaster scenes, simulated or not. She wanted to be inside the truck or out, taking vital signs and talking through various stages of trauma. She loved the thinking that everything was going to be all right, even when statistical scenarios augured the opposite. She enjoyed dueling desperation and contemplating what Walker Percy meant by ‘carapace’. Besides rushing to catastrophes, she would read half afternoons through, massaging or scratching her neck, if not exactly buying into the optimism of Toni Morrison’s Baby Suggs, who exhorted her gathered people to "love your neck; put a hand on it, grace it, stroke it and hold it up."

That was the novel she was reading—Beloved—when her crew got the call of a head-on collision on the main highway west of town. And, like Beloved, there was reportedly a toddler involved in the fray. Sylvia instinctively readied the infant gear for restarting hearts and respiration, then cleared her mind with the Serenity Prayer, also by instinct. Some of her compatriots pattered and even joked in the same stretch of anticipation; the rescuers’ code was carte blanche to pump blood into the ones who would have to face it.

At the site the car was duly smashed in on the driver’s side, but the driver was out and holding his little boy. Both were crying for evidently different reasons: the blood on his father’s face scared and confused the kid, while the animation of his squirmy son heartened the dad: they had survived and could now, oddly, celebrate. Sylvia came over to check eye dilation and span the spine of the little boy first, then the father. Her colleague swabbed a nasty cut on the man’s forehead and wrapped a bandage four times around, frightening the boy more with this mummifying action. Sylvia held his hand and started to sing, gradually transitioning the kid from his father’s arms to hers. As they walked to the ambulance she asked the man, first in German and then in English—she could tell they were Czech and had no local savvy beyond the ‘kusinem’ that the man now expressed for the tenth time—‘do you want anything from the car right now, something from the back seat?’ The police were on the scene and would impound the vehicle and protect the valuables—that the man knew—but when asked by his dad the same question, the kid said, between sobs, “Liska”. ‘His stuffed fox,’ he translated, and she spoke over her shoulder for someone to fetch it. They settled in to the truck and the man started a lullaby, and Liska arrived and the doors closed. ‘You’re Christian,’ said Sylvia. ‘I can tell by your song.’ ‘And you’re an angel for us,’ responded the man. ‘Kusinem.’

Halfway through the ride, the radio relay gave indication of a lawn-mower accident, and though another ambulance would be dispatched, the driver knew that the location was only two kilometers north of them on this rather remote stretch of road. A quick discussion of options determined that the present patients would not be endangered with a detour in that direction, but Sylvia was forlorn that she would have to be the one to step out of this soiree to attend to the next. Before the ambulance skidded to a stop she patted Liska on the head and shook hands with the father and son, the latter saying ‘ba ba’ contentedly. She jumped out for what she knew would be a messier situation, and resigned herself to the fact she would not see Liska’s family again.

They did write, however, a few months later, to 'Paramedic Sylvia c/o the Debrecen hospital'. It almost didn’t get to her, as by this time she had transferred back to Szarvas, her Debrecen days now done. ‘Dear Sylvia’, it began, and she scanned through the we-are-alright and grateful sentiments to a kid’s drawing on an adjoining page—a hedgehog leaning against a tee-pee with two smiling people inside. The narrative on the other page explained: the night before the accident had them camping in northwest Romania, in a torrential rain—forty hours of storm that flooded much of the continent, and in the case of Prague, killed off several creatures in its flood-plain zoo. ‘The elephant refused to move to higher ground; the rhino charged at the handlers, who had no recourse but to shoot him; the sea lion swam out of its pool and floated with the Vltava all the way to the North Sea, where it died of exhaustion. My son called it “The Very Scary Flood” and remembered one survivor of it, albeit not a zoo creature. A hedgehog crept into the soggy entryway of our tent and nuzzled close to our warmth. We talked about letting it in but of course didn’t. Probably it just needed temporary relief, but we watched it from the mesh screen until it fell asleep, and then we did the same. In the morning it was gone. When I asked what to give Sylvia for a thank you present, Josef drew this. He also said you can borrow Liska if you ever need to.’

There was a return address and many days when she contemplated taking them up on that loan. The little clinic in Szarvas had a lounge that served the paramedics’ office, with bookshelves only she added to. Now she pinned up the hedgehog with the tented people and immersed herself in a book by Zsuzsa Bánk, The Swimmer. The man of the title could hardly be considered a protagonist, as he confounded his daughter and son and others they leeched off of for season upon season at the cabins and dilapidated villas around Lake Balaton. Kálmán, the father, would stare vacantly at the ceiling beams, smoke a lot and drink a little. He was swimming in such states, in the trenches of his hermetic mind. “I didn’t know whether his life was slipping by him or whether it was he who was slipping through life without making an effort,” the daughter narrated. “He broke off relationships so easily, leaving no trail for anybody to follow, wiping out any trace of us, and today I don’t know whether it should bother me when I recall this, or whether it ever bothered me at all.” Sylvia folded the corner of this page. “I think we’d grown used to this coming and going, this stopping and starting, just as you grow accustomed to something that you know will stay the same, will never change whether you like it or not.”

The dog-ears served a practical purpose, sometimes. Tossing a book aside mid-sentence was typically the case when an emergency called, and at least returning to a poignant part allowed her to get back into the swing. More often than not, however, she abandoned one book to start another. Like the hedgehog, she felt itinerant and not in need of any full resolution.

But Sylvia finished The Swimmer in one sitting and in fact re-read it when, some years later, a man floated out on a raft to the middle of Lake Balaton to kill himself. It was his second attempt that autumn, and the first to be streamed live on Mad’ar media. His raft had on it a blowtorch and a yet unopened tank of benzene, and from his cupped hands he shouted absurdities to the circling patrols: ‘stay back or I douse myself!’ ‘What do you want?’ the negotiators tried to establish. ‘Her. She knows. Bring her out here and everything will be finished.’ ‘What do you mean 'finished'?’ ‘We can all go home, that’s what I mean.’

The standoff lasted into the night and quite obviously the eventuality of sleep entered everybody’s mind. ‘Where is she?’ the man bellowed, lifting to tank to his head. ‘Who is she?’ rejoined a megaphoned voice, measuring the time. ‘She knows, and she’s gotta be watching your freak show.’ Indeed, a stenographer typed within the hull of a stationed boat, and this script sped across the bottom of many voyeurs’ screens. Sylvia was one such watcher, and she noted that a fire crew was close at hand, but no paramedics in sight. The coast guard had cordoned off boats within a two hundred meter radius, so perhaps someone at that distance could rush in to salve the first-degree burns that were bound to happen. As it turned out, when the first rush of gas flowed out of the tank and the torch spewed its dragon-tongue flame, the man fell violently backwards and into the waiting water. Ready frogmen dove to his rescue and, for the second spectacular time, the fighting man failed. Some reporters followed up his muddled story, but the mental health facility kept him forthrightly out of the public view.

‘She knows’ haunted Sylvia, whether or not a 'she' existed. Every paramedic had some training in suicide prevention, and some had experience in talking someone down (or up as the case might be). More common was the pumping of stomachs or tourniquets on gashed arms. Sylvia had the uncommon instance of getting information out of a mother passing out from carbon monoxide poisoning: her twin babies were not in their cribs and not in the exhaust-filled garage, not anywhere near the property. ‘Please,’ Sylvia begged, ‘let us take care of them.’ She had no more magic in her words than the other paramedics, who had been met with stubborn silence. Sylvia hugged the mother and thought to whisper ‘river?’ in her ear, which made the woman nod. An hour later, their mother dead, the infants were found floating Moses-style in the bed of their perambulator, strapped in and crying, well downstream from the town’s outer residence.

A country of ten million can almost know its whole self, or at least references therein. Sylvia was listed less as a hero than as a paramedic of certain qualities, even if no one was tallying her ‘Liska’ moments. When the madman reentered Lake Balaton with a 3-year-old on his raft—no gas or blowtorches this time, but a large anchor tied to his ankle—and paddled out to his twice-foiled circus ring, Sylvia was called on for duty. She sat in the back of a speeding police car from Szarvas to Siófok, then in a boat waiting dockside for her services. She thought of nothing that could reasonably prepare her for the situation: no quotes from any book, no training parallel or whispered trick. And though her mind did resort to the images of his last occasion, now all was real instead of surreal (or maybe she was mixing that up). Then it was reasonable what the negotiators did to bide time: they had only a madman to save. Now there was an innocent—a hostage—and no one had a clue what to do. She saw that the child was strapped to the man’s back, 'as if a fardel,' she strangely mused, 'in Hamlet’s rhetoric.' She saw such a short rope between anchor and ankle, and estimated they were above fifty meters of water in this ironically shallow sea. Divers were ready, Sylvia was told, but the man kept all boats at considerable distance. ‘I’m not messing this up,’ he snarled, standing like a drunk on his upgraded raft. ‘She’s irrelevant now,’ he made known. ‘There’s nothing left to do.’

‘But give us the kid,’ the main negotiator prompted Sylvia to say. She stood mute. ‘Please—he’s heard from the rest of us—you need to speak to him.’

Sylvia started to cry, and quavered in a voice just loud enough, ‘Kálmán,.. I’m here.’ ‘Not Kálmán, stupid—you don’t know me.’ ‘I know you’re not Kálmán, but you haven’t introduced yourself to me.’ ‘Don’t play games—if you’re here, you know my god-damned name.’ ‘And who is your son? I honestly haven’t heard his name yet.’ ‘Does it matter? Call him dead.’ ‘Call me Sylvia.’

No one spoke for over a minute. Sylvia tried to remember the Serenity Prayer but forgot the first, familiar phrase. The name of the son was passed into her hand on a scrap of paper, and when she looked down she knew she couldn’t use it. She thought of telling the man about the hedgehog or the twins in the buggy—that made for something to think about, at least. What else was she here for?

She opened her mouth to start and, leaning forward on the rail of the boat, realized she was falling into the water. She kicked up and pulled at the water to go deeper, putting distance to the boat and unfathomably toward the shaky little raft. When she surfaced she heard shouts from all sides, and swam with the burden of her heavy uniform toward the screaming man and son. Divers now entered and flipped toward her —and the raft's—direction. She beat on seeing in a blur what was going to happen: that he’d leap from the other side and she’d have no real chance to catch him. But in a final dive below the raft she managed to grab his plunging body, feeling for the straps that tied the little boy, realizing all was lost in this incomprehensible moment. She clung desperately and hoped her body fat would temper the effect of the anchor. Then she felt like she was the greater burden, tangled senselessly into the depths. A diver ripped her arms from her sinking object. Water filled her gasp and life was lost.

‘God, grant me the courage,’ she finally remembered.

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Cheer, cheer, cheer!

Go for it, Tilo!

Dan mentioned one my Dad poems from a few years ago, but he was unaware that I had cut that poem from the current Thirty Birds collection. I was trying to keep the poems at a thirty count, and A Call to Cheer didn't quite make the cut. I am still happy with the poem, but it was more personal and less related to actual birds. A bird named team didn't really count, I decided, although I did at least reference the Northern Cardinal's spring call (cheer! cheer! cheer!). Anyway, I am happy to share it, but I'll add it as a sidenote to the Thirty Birds collection. You can find this at http://www.thirtybirdspoetry.com, posted as a comment to the opening epigram (Come, you lost Atoms...)

Dick, where is your water poem?

Task for Tilo

and anyone else in this particular symposium. This Sunday, a week after one of the greatest professional sports days in Wisconsin history (thanks, Grandpa Dick), the NL Central champion Milwaukee Brewers will host their division rival St Louis Cardinals for the NL pennant and a trip to the World Series. All good thoughts to the Phillies, whom we saw this summer at Wrigley Field 'schooling' the Cubs, and perhaps the same to the Diamondbacks (just don't know these lesser-tradition teams), but this series is what the world wants to see. I'll borrow from Hamlet when he says,

"Ay, thou poor ghost, whiles memories hold a seat
In this distracted globe" (I, v, 103-4).

The 'globe' is, of course, the south London theatre, the world (precursor to 'World Series') and--get ready!--the globe upon his, and everybody's, shoulders. His head! Sort of like Emily Dickinson's poem "The Brain is Wider than the Sky"...

My point is: this is big, bigger than labels like 'Battle of the Beers' or 'Suds Series'--in fact, I think in this post-industrial world we've come to understand cities as more than what they make. In 1982 Joe Vold was in- and out-of-character, pumping his fist in the Bejou co-op for the team he had only known in the radio abstract, imagining Musial and Brock before coming to Chicago to see Brock (at least) play at the friendly confines. Perhaps one influence to my career in literature was the aesthetic that Jose Cardinal--erstwhile St Louis outfielder--was traded to the Cubs and played hard against his launch-mates.... A cardinal becomes a cub.... And now Ryan Theriot will have a post-season life as a former cub cardinal.

Back to--where were we?--Joe Vold. If 1982 passed in pride and grace, the '87 series was tougher: somebody insidiously gave him a cap with a lopsided stuffed cardinal on its visor and dared him to wear it in north Twinkieland (no longer Bejou, now Boy River). He did, and perhaps felt accursed; the Cardinals won every game in the abstract Busch stadium, but nary a one in the fabled Metrodome. There was nothing artificial in the wins, if artificial turf had too much influence in both sides of 'home field': the Twins were the better team, as the speedsters of St Louis were going 'gently into that good night'...

So, Tilo (and Joey, who has an email invite to this site, and anyone else who wants to weigh in), be our scribe this series. We loved the legacy of Yount and Molitor, Stormin' Gorman and Cecil Cooper, Ben Oglive and Jim Ganter. We watched them hit into the Golden Gloves of Keith Hernandez and Ozzie Smith, and field the prowess of Porter, McGee and Lonnie Smith. We saw aces in Augustine, Vukovich, Andujar and Forsch. Games were saved by Sutter and Haas. Wisdom exuded from Fingers and Kaat. Kuenn and Herzog were firm at the helm.

Now what shall we do with our Morgans and Hart, our Braun and Prince Fielder, our Gallardo and Axford? How shall we write about Pujols and Molina, Berkman and Furcal, Carpenter and Salas? Is LaRussa the skipper that Roenicke is? Are wallbangers, base-stealers running this game?

I set you, dear Tilo, on top of this task. Burrow through Uncle Jon's Thirty Birds and you'll find more of the mythos...

And--Dad will forgive me--I'm pulling for the Brew Crew. Their time has come, and it won't be at the expense of the Redbirds, but rather to complement this most wonderful of American (National) traditions.

Uncle Dan